Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Are the Ryzen 3rd generation CPUs good for Lightroom Classic? (for example with FPS capture software like we discussed in another topic some time ago).- looking at the tables - how come Ryzen 3700x is faster in merging panorama than 3800x or even 3900x? Starting with "everything else", Ryzen compares decently against the eight and ten core CPUs coming in at just 5-10% slower. The most relevant takeaway from Puget’s benchmarks is that high-end CPU’s aren’t necessarily the best choice for photo editing. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. For exporting, I would look at the "Export 100 images" which was RAW to JPG. Between Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 3700x, is there a notice difference in speed? 3200 c16 is truly bottom of the barrel for Ryzen. CPU utilisation on 100% on all cores. Lightroom CC 2015.10.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Kaby Lake, Ryzen 7, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Performance, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance. The reason behind this is simply that previously, we did not have Ryzen fully qualified as an entire platform and were not comfortable running the RAM beyond the official specifications. Thanks for the reply. I did buy the AMD ryzen as the i7 7700k is much more expensive in India (at the time of writing this). The reason is that we have found higher frequency RAM to be much more susceptible to failure so even if higher frequency RAM is faster, we still probably wouldn't offer it. In Adobe Lightroom Classic, the Intel Core 10th Gen processors such as the i9 10900K and i7 10700K do very well in active tasks like scrolling through images and switch modules - coming in at about 5% faster than a similarly priced AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen CPU. While the Core i7 7700K was 15-20% faster than the Ryzen CPUs for this task, Ryzen was actually around 5-7% faster than the "High End" Core i7 CPUs. The new Ryzen 3000 chips officially support memory speeds up to 3200MHz. And yes I understand that you sell these systems to your customers at stock speeds. If Ryzen is out of the question it now comes down to overclocked 7700k vs overclocked 6800k? If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the total scores. are limited to 1 thread in critical functions. We did do some testing comparing DDR4-2666 to DDR4-3200 on both Intel and AMD CPUs, but the only place it measurably increased performance was when importing and exporting images. Okay, so I loaded up Cinebench R20 on repeat, putting a ray-tracing render workload on each thread the CPU provides, and then: - Opened up Edge (didn't have Chrome on these testbeds)- Opened several tabs with various websites, including YouTube- Watched a video, surfed around a bit, etc- Copied files in Windows Explorer- Played a quick game of Microsoft Solitaire, Both systems felt perfectly usable. That is something we're trying to convince the Lightroom Classic dev team to add so we can test it in the future though. I have issue with the testing method. I edit 2-4k pics monthly too, culling through at least 20k - on a mobile i5-4278U (2.6ghz). Based on Gamers Nexus recent youtube video on Ryzen memory tuning, gains of 8-10% are possible using 3866 c16 downclocked to 3800 and 1900mhz FCLOCK. Hmm, that's a shame. I am certain the performance jump will be less than what we've seen from 3800x to 3900x, but it will still hammer intel's newest Cascade Lake offerings. wasted time) and so is my biggest concern. Find jedec-3200 or run Intel on XMP or stop faking tests. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. If you want to compare the scores between each CPU with HT/SMT enabled when supported, the second image below includes those results. However, if you really dig into the results, there are really two primary tasks where Ryzen blows away Intel that is causing the higher overall scores: exporting and building smart previews. that is exactly what i would to like to know too... i dont care waiting for export a little longer, when i can do meanwhile other tasks smoothly.Planning to upgrade from i7 quad to i9 9900k wit GB z390 designare with 64-128gb, reading this article doubting if maybe amd would be worth it.....the choice would be easier if the HT?SMT issue would be solved. ), the Intel 9th gen processors do still hold a slight lead. Can you estimate when we can download the benmark to test our machines? 1:1 previews are full resolution, so 5184x3456 in our case. But I am still thinking the faster IPC of the 7700k will make the computer feel snappier - resulting in time savings for everything other than the exporting phase. Compared to the Intel Core i9 10900X, the new Ryzen 9 5900X is 20% faster, while the Ryzen … I'm totally aware this is not something scientific but nevertheless super valuable. And let's say it: Thanks AMD for new competition in the CPU market. Interestingly, the difference between the two Ryzen CPUs was just a small 1% for this task so if you do decide to use Ryzen and primarily care about export times, you might as well save money and use the Ryzen 7 1700X. Seems like the 6800k is the better choice if exporting a lot (I use Canon DPP to export RAW to 8 bit TIFF which currently takes 10 seconds per image on my i5-3570k system, and I do frequent single image exports). I have a lot of issues with my graphics hardware and laptop in general with Lightroom. Small question, why didn't you go with X570 MB with TB3 support for Lightroom workstation build instead of the GB board? If your workflow includes other software packages (We have articles for Photoshop, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, etc. Since Reg. Puget Systems Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT. AMD and Microsoft report there are no scheduler issues with Ryzen. And exactly as you've mentioned opening a few tabs here and there (eg. Would it be closely aligned with "RAW to DNG" or "RAW to JPG" ? I wonder why these folks who are "complaining that we are making them under-perform" don't also say they have run into stabity problems like Puget has discovered. Taken on a Canon EOS REBEL T3i, 5x 18MP RAW (5184x3456) Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. High performance mode is actually what we default to during benchmarks, but the difference between it and balanced shouldn't be much as long as the system isn't idle for too long. The architecture is Zen 2. 4 slots populated with 16GB modules each gives a maximum of 64GB. Anyway, my next machine will be based on AMD then :) thanks again for your effort, this test is a real benchmark of how CPU should be really tested in software... 1) Yes, GPU acceleration is pretty much always enabled in our testing unless otherwise noted. As this was tested on Windows 10, would it be possible to test on Windows 7, or possibly when MS fix the scheduling bug which is hitting Ryzen performacne? Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Overall, Ryzen still isn't a good match for Lightroom even with the performance improvements. If it's more OpenCL-heavy, I've found this generally is better supported & faster with AMD. Considering that Ryzen is also either slower or comparable to these two Intel CPU options in other programs like Photoshop, Intel CPUs are a pretty clear winner for photo editing and image processing workstations. You are right that the 7700k should feel overall snappier and is better for photo editing work in general. While Win7 boots just fine on Ryzen, MSFT announced you will not get Windows Updates if you do so. Thanks Matt. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. Whenever a new generation of CPUs is launched, the main question everyone wants answered is how fast they are. Not saying you can't do it of course, but just be aware of the potential issues before jumping into it. Since the Ryzen CPUs we tested are only about $100-200 cheaper than the i7 6850K, that is a pretty large difference in performance. So I saw a video on YT (https://www.youtube.com/wat... showing the how different memory speeds effect Ryzen performance. Absolutely! None of our Lightroom testing should need more than ~20GB of RAM so the amount of memory in each system shouldn't cause any performance difference. - we will be basing the majority of our conclusions with HT/SMT disabled in the instances that it improves performance. Close. Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Merged to 187MP (48085x3898) The 3950X and TR 3rd gen we'll just have to wait and see. With 3866 c16, or even 3600 c16 kit, the Ryzen CPU could really stretch its legs. The only caveat is that for many of the active tasks in Lightroom Classic (scrolling through images, switching between modules, etc. Information on the Utah State University - contacts, students, faculty, finances. I would suggest looking over out "How much faster is a modern workstation for Lightoom" article as well: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Getting micro-stutters if I absolutely try to shift to doing anything else up the the point where it's possible to freeze the machine. To make it even more difficult, depending on the hardware the point where it starts skipping around changes. Hey Tassos, sorry for taking a while to reply, but I've been working on a new article and wanted to wait until it was up. When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. It is kind of like how much storage you have available on an SSD - if you don't have enough that is a problem, but if you have a ton of empty space it doesn't make things go faster. Since our testing is the same between that article and this one, you could use the i7 3570K system in that article as a baseline to gauge relative performance. Do you recommend WX 7100 or Quadro P4000 for Lightroom/Photoshop/Premiere suite? If so I'd still be keen to pick up the Intel over the AMD due to that efficiency while exports are running. And because you do that, it automatically means that every photographer does the same thing! TLDR: it's possible to still interact with the machine for light multitasking operations. Unless you're I/O or memory bandwidth limited, it seems to me that ought to be a embarrassingly parallel . For culling and just moving around Lr, the 9900K is better by a small margin, but the 3900X is significantly faster if you care about export performance or use smart previews. So we basically would have to do a pixel checksum across a large area to see if things changed in the exact manner we expect. Which test would be show exporting performance of Canon DPP (from RAW to 8 bit TIFF)? - Do you think 3rd gen threadripper will still be bad for LR? Changes in core count/price are coming.I don't think you're gonna have 15% gain in "active tasks" with 3600x over 6700. Intel CPU will cost you around the same that this 3600 AMD CPU + motherboard.//Possibly you're gonna gain some performance when they resolve problems with HT (or not, I would not take this much into consideration). Doing this does not improve performance with every CPU, however, so we are going to clearly mark in the charts when the results are with HT/SMT off. Normally we would go through the results on a test by test basis, but this time the results were remarkably consistent across the various tests. Look for some near term BIOS updates from planar makers. This is very useful. I'm a landscape photographer that lives in LR, working through thousands of very large RAW images per outing. We dropped 1:1 preview testing when we switched over to using Adobe's plugin API as much as possible and you unfortunately can't tell Lightroom to generate 1:1 previews through the API for some reason. We have some really cool projects we are going to be starting on (I hope) early next year that will dramatically improve this. Great article. Auto Align, Auto Tone, No Deghost, 11x 18MP RAW (5184x3456) John, I haven't personally used P4000, but I came from the K4000 and migrated over to AMD for the WX 7100 and Ryzen 7 1800x. All I need is 10-bit support to run my 10-bit monitors. This is perfect timing as I'm planning a 3rd gen Ryzen build for Lightroom specifically. I don't know why exactly, but for some reason Lightroom … https://www.youtube.com/wat... What resolution were the previews made?