- Do you think 3rd gen Ryzen using gen 4 NVME would change any of these results meaningfully? John, I haven't personally used P4000, but I came from the K4000 and migrated over to AMD for the WX 7100 and Ryzen 7 1800x. Our new test process is just an improvement on the old and adds testing for Sony .ARW along with vastly improved testing for "active" tasks like scrolling through images and brush lag. That in itself might be something we could benchmark (maybe), but LR gives almost no feedback for when things like that happen. That is just a fact of life with this kind of testing.3) I hear you, and thanks for the feedback! If you want to compare the scores between each CPU with HT/SMT enabled when supported, the second image below includes those results. We discovered an issue with Intel Hyperthreading and AMD SMT that causes low performance for some tasks. As far as the Intel X-series and AMD Threadripper processors go, there honestly isn't much to talk about. In regards to LightRoom performance does the GPU have any real impact on performance? It's true we didn't have to have 128GB of RAM (we could have used 64GB) but we are finding more and more that our customers are starting to go above 64GB if they can. Phoronix's Darktable-on-Linux benchmarks ought not to be a too dissimilar CPU challenge, and there the AMD chips come out looking rather better. I wonder why these folks who are "complaining that we are making them under-perform" don't also say they have run into stabity problems like Puget has discovered. Seems like the 6800k is the better choice if exporting a lot (I use Canon DPP to export RAW to 8 bit TIFF which currently takes 10 seconds per image on my i5-3570k system, and I do frequent single image exports). That is another important consideration for me - Any guesses on how 3950x will fare in these benchmarks? It's be interesting to see what the results would be if you were to script up parallel instances of Adobe's DNG converter to do the same 100 conversions. I did hear from somewhere that the higher resolution your photos are, the more likely that GPU acceleration will help so that might be the source of the "it is bad" vs "it is awesome" opinions. its really bad. Since that is up in the air, we decided to go ahead with this CPU roundup article since our testing uncovered some very interesting results. And yes I understand that you sell these systems to your customers at stock speeds. I would like to see if the performance gains from both Intel and AMD. 1:1 previews are full resolution, so 5184x3456 in our case. However, if you are concerned primarily about export times, the i7 6850K is about 40% faster at exporting images in addition to being 11-16% faster for everything else - all for only a small increase in price. Tests results for DaVinci Resolve indicate, according to Puget Systems, that “the AMD Ryzen … The most trusted website I have found when it comes benchmarks for hardware in Adobe programs is Puget Systems. Jedec memory is C20-C22-C24 and 1.2V.Or use XMP for both systems with like 2666C12 for intel (not c19 crap like now), or find at last jedec spec 3200 memory for AMD system. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. We hope to have things ready pretty shortly after launch, but it all depends on exactly when the launch is. My impression is that the relative performance between different CPU models should be similar, but again I can't be 100% sure at the moment. I love stabilty. I think that is really a call that each person has to make for themselves, but I personally would go with the higher capacity. If your workflow includes other software packages (We have articles for Photoshop, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, etc. Since Reg. Can you estimate when we can download the benmark to test our machines? I do know that 6-8 cores reveal better performance at higher resolutions. None of our Lightroom testing should need more than ~20GB of RAM so the amount of memory in each system shouldn't cause any performance difference. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 includes an eight-core Ryzen 9 4800HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q graphics, 16GB of DDR4/3200 memory, a 1TB PCIe 3.0 SSD, a 14-inch FHD screen, and a weight … Again assuming you can overclock all the CPUs roughly the same amount, based on the 10 second per image you are seeing with the 3570K you should see about 6.6 seconds with a 7700K and 4.25 seconds with the 6850K. Does the performance on Smart previews reflect the performance of 1:1 previews ? Depending on whether and … You can try optimizing your current system for running faster during your work time ;)---end edit//With i7-6700k you should have 1151 socket board - so just throw in there i9-9900k. I would love to run this benchmark to test mine system (just to see & laugh).--EDIT: well, I forgot that Intel is changing their chipset almost every gen. Well, having Z170 or similar you need to switch mobo too. Yes, higher scores are better. However, if LR needs 18GB and you are choosing between 32GB of higher frequency RAM vs 64GB of safer RAM then it is really just a call between more performance but higher risk of failure versus a bit lower performance but more reliable and safer long-term (less need for upgrades). On the flip side, the Intel Hyperthreading (HT) and AMD SMT issue are still very much present - you can read the details about it in our support post Hyperthreading & SMT causing low performance in Lightroom Classic. My wife uses both Lightroom and Photoshop extensively and Ryzen 1st Gen CPUs were flagged as mediocre performers with those products by Puget Systems. Thanks so much for your great work!I'm on a i7-7700k system at the moment and am thinking of upgrading to an i7 9th gen 9700k. We've done some testing exporting to different formats (TIFF included) and we found that while the total time of course changed, the relative performance between different CPUs doesn't change a whole lot which is why we usually only test exporting to JPG. Thunderbolt on PC is inconsistent enough even on fully certified platforms that I would highly recommend against using Thunerbolt on X570. Would you be able to rerun the tests ? While the Core i7 7700K was 15-20% faster than the Ryzen CPUs for this task, Ryzen was actually around 5-7% faster than the "High End" Core i7 CPUs. We have some really cool projects we are going to be starting on (I hope) early next year that will dramatically improve this. This is a short tutorial/comparison video on how to run run Puget After Effects Benchmark. Intel CPU will cost you around the same that this 3600 AMD CPU + motherboard.//Possibly you're gonna gain some performance when they resolve problems with HT (or not, I would not take this much into consideration). If you regularly follow our content, you may have noticed that several months ago we published a range of CPU comparison articles looking at Photoshop, Premiere Pro, After Effects, and many other applications. Really no way to know until it actually launches and we can test it. Do you expect to be able to publish results for the new chips shortly after launch? Puget Systems Lightroom Workstation – 4.1 (4.6) GHz twelve core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Nvidia GeForce 2060 Super (8 GB), 64 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe SSD. Here the 3300X edged out the Core i7-7700K, making it 8% faster than the 9400F. I want to get one (prob 3950x) but would love to see your analyses before pulling the trigger. Would greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts on this,Kind regards. However, if you really dig into the results, there are really two primary tasks where Ryzen blows away Intel that is causing the higher overall scores: exporting and building smart previews. I'm aware that 1700x might have been affected by the scheduler issues, but my bios, windows updates, drivers, etc are all up to date (which supposedly was to remove the issue). needed to perform a task (the lower the better), but the scores are... well, scores (the higher the better) - this is a little confusing as there is no clear explanation of this in the table. People talk gaming or solidworks/maya which is beyond my needs. ECC RAM is what we use in our X99 workstations that is what we wanted to test with. I keep zooming in and out and that's where I lose most of my time. Could Ryzen's dual channel memory (Intel broadwell-e is quad channel) be the reason for its bad export performance? We made a small utility that does this automatically as a temporary workaround until the root issue is fixed that you can download: https://www.pugetsystems.co... Hi Matt, many thanks for the long awaited test, it's amazing! Hey Tassos, sorry for taking a while to reply, but I've been working on a new article and wanted to wait until it was up. Since the results for exporting images was quite a bit different than the other Lightroom tasks we tested, we decided to separate our average CPU performance chart into two categories: exporting images and "everything else". Some we saw decent gains, others almost nothing at all: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . That is if there are reports of significant changes to reported performance...But at the very lease there is a baseline established now. For quite a while now Intel has held a dominant position in nearly every computing market, but there is a lot of hype around Ryzen due to the fact that you can get eight CPU cores for half the cost of an Intel processor of the same size. If someone had errors, they might not jump to suspecting their RAM speed. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom … Presumably yes, but most folks aren't repeatedly doing the same thing over and over with different hardware combinations. The most relevant takeaway from Puget’s benchmarks is that high-end CPU’s aren’t necessarily the best choice for photo editing. In the case of AMD's Ryzen, there are also a lot of questions surrounding how they compare to the processors available from Intel. This new AMD CPUs are really nice :) Last year i have buyed (for next few years) an i7 9700K and its blazingly fast even with huge 42Mpx A7R3 files!I keep watching your reviews and if someone asks for photo/video computer, i know, where to go for relevant informations... :). 4 slots populated with 16GB modules each gives a maximum of 64GB. Our current plan is to re-do our Ryzen testing sometime in May (probably) to give AMD time to get all their problems worked out with Microsoft and everyone else. Recommended Systems For: Adobe Lightroom Classic; Adobe Photoshop; Post Production. We dropped 1:1 preview testing when we switched over to using Adobe's plugin API as much as possible and you unfortunately can't tell Lightroom to generate 1:1 previews through the API for some reason. PugetSystems: Intel i9-7940x, 7960X & 7980XE vs TR 1950x benchmarks LightRoom, Photoshop, After Effect, Maya 3D, Cinema 4D. wasted time) and so is my biggest concern. I'm not sure how the numbers scale to time. It will be very subtle in most cases, but if I was in your shoes I would personally go with the 7700k. I might do a 'light' overclock but has there been any change in terms of ACTIVE tasks with the latest version of LR?Just how noticeable are the active tasks between an i7 9700k and say an AMD equivalent?In my case passive tasks aren't an issue. AMD and Microsoft report there are no scheduler issues with Ryzen. Even then, however, we only use boards that have TB integrated onto the boards. Anyway, my next machine will be based on AMD then :) thanks again for your effort, this test is a real benchmark of how CPU should be really tested in software... 1) Yes, GPU acceleration is pretty much always enabled in our testing unless otherwise noted. If you're bored, it'd be interesting to see if that translates to Lightroom. On the "low" end, the Ryzen 5 3600 ranges from 70% to more than 2x faster than the Core i5 9600K! (3.7-4GHz Turbo) 6 Core No it means that it’s possible and an option for photographers to do, i really dont think u get 30% more performance on premiere pro (i use it too) just oc'ing your rig ;) the number of cores makes the difference on premiere pro. that is exactly what i would to like to know too... i dont care waiting for export a little longer, when i can do meanwhile other tasks smoothly.Planning to upgrade from i7 quad to i9 9900k wit GB z390 designare with 64-128gb, reading this article doubting if maybe amd would be worth it.....the choice would be easier if the HT?SMT issue would be solved. I use Lightroom everyday. - Do you think 3rd gen threadripper will still be bad for LR? Not necessarily for Lightroom, but for Lightroom we also wouldn't recommend an X99 system in the first place - a Z270 system with a 7700K is going to be better overall. When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Look for some near term BIOS updates from planar makers. Programs like Photoshop and Lightroom deliver the best performance when they’re paired with generalist processors, like the Ryzen … However, since the 1700X and 1800X have eight CPU cores, we also included in our testing a number of "High End" Core i7 CPUs from Intel with six to ten CPU cores. Thanks - great article.Export is definitely the task which I feel like I'm waiting around for most (i.e. Especially the export benchmarks? Find jedec-3200 or run Intel on XMP or stop faking tests. Exporting images is the one area where Ryzen beats the Core i7 7700K, clocking in at about 10-11% faster. I did feel more lag when doing stuff on the internet, compared to what I am used to on systems with no active CPU load, but YouTube videos even at HD were perfectly smooth and the delays waiting for pages to load were not obnoxious. We have been doing testing with all three of these speeds since these chips launched, and I can tell you for sure that running the RAM at 3200Mhz is definitely a bit less stable if using four sticks, and it gets worse if you go beyond spec to 3600MHz. We have updated results looking at a range of CPUs in Lightroom including the Ryzen CPUs using the latest BIOS, drivers, and version of Lightroom: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Based on Gamers Nexus recent youtube video on Ryzen memory tuning, gains of 8-10% are possible using 3866 c16 downclocked to 3800 and 1900mhz FCLOCK. Thanks again for this additional time investment :). Is it right, that 9900k simply destroys everything, if I work with 8k timelapses (42mp)? It use all cores when importing and exporting. Hi William, thank you for taking the time to respond. Lots of reports that turning off GPU acceleration actually improves performance. Given that we are building hundreds of systems a month, we have to stick with what we can be sure is the most reliable configuration possible - and in the case of RAM, that means sticking with what CPU manufacturers officially certify their chips to work with. Not enough RAM causes performance problem, but having extra doesn't really improve performance at all. Unless, I understand the detailed results wrong, see below:- (a slight critique from my side) in the detailed result tables the results are a little confusing: I understand that results for particular raw file types and processors are given as time (seconds?) Another consideration is that when I eventually upgrade my camera to a higher megapixel count the exporting time will increase noticeably so a 2 second difference now could mean 4+ seconds in the future. Thanks for the article and fast test of the new Ryzen CPU's.After these test's i changed my mind from buying a R7 1700 (OC3,7) to a 7700K (OC4,5+). Option 1: Copy the "pugetsystems.lrplugin" folder to “C:⧵Users⧵ AppData⧵Roaming⧵Adobe⧵Lightroom⧵Modules ". Doesn't matter how fast the drive is if the CPU/RAM is the bottleneck. Very good and detailed as usual. - Do you think the benchmark for Develop Auto WB & Tone is representative of overall "slider responsiveness" in the develop module? This should give way more bang for the bucks. Auf welchem Niveau ist die GPU-Beschleunigung einer Ryzen APU (konkret: 4650G) in Lightroom/Photoshop zu erwarten? ), the Intel 9th gen processors do still hold a slight lead. I recommend waiting for 3950x. Everyone, AMD Ryzen is BRAND NEW architecture never seen before in a CPU. Puget systems also publishes extensive Adobe PS benchmarks too. The architecture is Zen 2. And even if adobe manages to significantly improve multicore performance, it's probably going to take some time from now, and if it takes something like 4 years to do so, most users who bought a 7700k today will be already considering buying a new cpu. It is very difficult to do subjective testing like that, at least in an automated / repeatable fashion. 19. Every time I do some LR testing I give another few techniques a try - hopefully one of these LR updates will introduce something that I can use to improve our testing even further. The subjective "snappier" interface feel is suspect, IMO. Happy Compute! As a reminder, due to the HT/SMT performance issue in Lightroom Classic, our analysis from this point forward will be done with HT/SMT disabled whenever it results in a higher overall score. Thank you so much for the faster response, what you said is exactly what I have been finding online and it is hard to find review on workstation cards in relationship to Adobe suites. Thanks for the review Matt. So I guess the decision you have to make is if the difference between 6.6 seconds with the 7700K and 4.25 seconds with the 6850K when you export a single image is worth giving up overall faster performance (and responsiveness) for everything else in Lightroom. I have a lot of issues with my graphics hardware and laptop in general with Lightroom. Its really hard to know what makes the difference considering how different AMD's CPU architecture is from Intel's. For the new Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X, the performance lead over Intel widens quite a bit. Hyperthreading & SMT causing low performance in Lightroom Classic, HT/SMT performance issue in Lightroom Classic, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series. In fact, if anything the 128GB of RAM will cause a slight performance decrease since it is ECC RAM which causes a very tiny decrease in performance. Intel is simply able to achieve much higher performance for similar or much lower cost. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. (3.4-4GHz Turbo) 10 Core. The 3rd generation Ryzen processors are terrific for Lightroom Classic and were on average about 20% faster than a similarly priced Intel 9th gen processor. ), you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. Getting micro-stutters if I absolutely try to shift to doing anything else up the the point where it's possible to freeze the machine. The new Ryzen 3000 chips officially support memory speeds up to 3200MHz. There were some that we covered in our later article: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . This does still mean that our testing is a bit biased in favor of Ryzen since we decided to stick with DDR4-2666 for the Intel and AMD Threadripper platforms, but as you will see in the final results, that extra performance in a couple of tests is not really going to change our conclusions so we are not too worried about it. But still... How many photographers out there OC their rigs? As for more RAM vs faster RAM, i would say the most important thing is that you simply have enough. The PCI-E add-on cards (even from Gigabyte) just don't seem to be as stable or reliable as the integrated version for whatever reason. You may get lucky and it will work with whatever specific device you happen to be using, but it is more likely that it won't work quite right. It is also very possible that different combinations of speed, timings, voltages, and even individual CPU samples will lead to more (or less) problems - so some might get lucky and have a resilient CPU, and thus not have many problems themselves. Its true about GPU use on PS/LR that Adobe doesn't tap hope that changes. There is actually no certified Thunderbolt support on X570 - we have confirmed this directly with AMD. Ryzen 3 is not the same as Ryzen 3rd gen.Title says "Intel 9th gen"(which is also not completely correct), but "Ryzen 3" and "Threadripper 2"... Ryzen 3000 is indeed third gen Ryzen. My conclusion from your article that the significant outperform on the other benchmarks for 3900x (including "responsiveness" benchmarks like the brush & previews) is better than the maybe unnoticeable outperform on 9900k on these handful. The second one I created from the chart on their website which has a ton of HEDT CPUs included too(I omitted them). It is one of the more "finicky" benchmarks we have since we have to use a lot of external scripts to do things that can't be done through the plug-in API. No one else is making (or should I say sharing?) This would also increase the cost difference between Ryzen and an Intel processor with more than four cores in these particular systems. I'm still able to jump to a different catalogue, start making my picks, possibly even do some light editing (slightly slower ofc but doable). Maybe one of AMD's engineers could figure out what makes the difference, but in the end what really matters is actual real-world performance. And let's say it: Thanks AMD for new competition in the CPU market. Or maybe it is the difference between the more typical L3 cache on AMD and "Smart Cache" on Intel or even the maturity of Hyperthreading on Intel. You guys are the only ones that do these kind of test in the business and are uniquely placed to do them fairly easy (I hope). From my understanding it doesn't can anyone comment on this? Not only will we include results for a few of the previous generation Ryzen CPUs, but also the latest AMD Threadripper, Intel 9th Gen, and Intel X-series CPUs. Graduates of Utah State University - the names, photos, skill, job, location. If it's less than 15% .. i wouldnt go all the trouble. 9 months later I am still scratching my head at this poor performance on a ryzen 1700x with an rx580. Question due to the AMD 3900X update and it taking such a high spot in the ranking: Do you guys also test these CPU's on how they react to high load / multitasking scenarios? I couldn't find this info in the text, sorry if I missed it. Especially with the launch of Skylake-X (which is also covered in the article I linked) Ryzen simply isn't a good choice for Lightroom. Intel Core i7 6950X 3.0GHz The first is exporting images where Ryzen was 10-11% faster than the Intel Core i7 7700K. Thanks for this Matt! Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Because the HT/SMT issue is so dramatic - it almost doubles export times in some cases! If you can wait - just wait for 10th gen Intel. I've personally noticed a huge difference in between AMD and Intel (Ryzen 1700x and 9900K) in how it handles situations where CPU is at 100% load already. In these tasks, the Ryzen 9 3900X is about 80% faster than the Core i9 9900K while the Ryzen 7 3700X/3800X are about 55% faster than the Core i9 9700K. Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Are the Ryzen 3rd generation CPUs good for Lightroom Classic? This is perfect timing as I'm planning a 3rd gen Ryzen build for Lightroom specifically. Option 2: Launch Lightroom Classic and go to "File -> Plug-in … The app is scalable. My observation on 9900K vs 1700x (not exactly a direct competitor but they have similar export/rendering power) is as follows: 9900K - Renders a timelapse with LRtimelpse from ~600 RAW files (files from A7III downscaling to 4K). CUDA is great, but still has limited app support. I'm actually not 100% sure when we will have the Lr benchmark up for download, but probably in the next couple months. the latter ones have faster clock... 3800x is basically an overclocked 3700x. However, Lightroom Classic currently heavily favors AMD processors for passive tasks like exporting which allows the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen … If Adobe can get it's head out regarding … Great article. Right now, DDR4-2400 appears to be rock solid and even DDR4-2666 shouldn't be a problem, but going beyond that we feel is a bit of a risk. Unless the editing is really a pain for you. Although AMD has some interesting stuff coming out soon with their 7nm 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X chip, Lightroom is still historically most ... then the Intel Core i7 8700K is still our go-to recommendation for Lightroom. AMD was more focused on IPC gain in Ryzen, and under developed in other areas which tend to be underutilized (like AVX). which makes it a pretty big project to tackle.2) Honestly, I think most of that is margin of error. So the only way to prevent the 9900K from being run into the ground by the 3900X is by disabling HT, and thus crippling it badly for all other applications you use - including the OS itself. Not making excuses for Adobe specifically here, just explaining that the idea that "everything should use all the cores!" I edit 2-4k pics monthly too, culling through at least 20k - on a mobile i5-4278U (2.6ghz). Whenever a new generation of CPUs is launched, the main question everyone wants answered is how fast they are. You may want to skip over the 3800X since the 3700X performs almost exactly the same, but all the other models are great choices. I believe I am more concerned with "Active Tasks" or seeing results as I edit. Has there been any updates to LR CC that help Ryzen performance since this article was published? Awesome, thanks so much for everything! All this means is that if you don't have a problem with longer export times and don't often use smart previews, Intel is likely to still feel a bit "snappier" in Lightroom Classic. After Effects will be virtually the same. Doing this does not improve performance with every CPU, however, so we are going to clearly mark in the charts when the results are with HT/SMT off. Lightroom CC 2015.10.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Kaby Lake, Ryzen 7, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Performance, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance.